KawaiiSeanSan wrote:
QUOTE:
Two huge factors play here in my opinion. Age and maturity. While age does influence maturity, there is no linear line you can throw down that says well this person is 13 therefore he is this mature. You can say that he is about this mature but if maturity were a number the standard deviation (range) would be huge because of personal experiences.
If we are talking about romantic relationships only than I agree with this completely, and would venture to say that people of two completely varying maturity levels wouldn't even be able to make a romantic relationship work.
If we are talking about the legal aspects that go along with this, it would make it too hard to put a guide to it, it would have to be case by case and would be too much of an imposition on everyone to try and sort out if each relationship is legally allowed.
KawaiiSeanSan wrote:
QUOTE:
Maturity is one of those things that starts at nil and builds up over time (age).
Agreed, different people do mature faster than others due to whatever circumstances they find themselves in.
KawaiiSeanSan wrote:
QUOTE:
One point I need to clarify though is the reverse maturity statement I proposed earlier. By my own argument it would be fine for a 12 year old and an 18 year old with the maturity of a 12 year old to date. Hence I would set the line at dating at the maturity level of 17 years. I would say 16, but I would also like to argue that people that are dating at the age of 16 and are doing well are probably mature for their age. And of course, both parties must be consensual and looking for a real relationship.
I am not entirely sure that I agree with a need for a maturity of 16 to be able to date (assuming that establishing matuiry in every case is possible). I would however, like to request one point of definition to make sure that we are arguing for or against the same point. By dating what is it that you mean?