In Response

All of the comments so far raise an important issue I believe, however, they also seem to miss the point of the article and I wish to address them personally. 
 
Firstly, do let me stress that I am not advocating promiscuity and do begin by stating my belief that monogamy and commitment are desirable and obtainable qualities of gay relationships. I too am aware of the promiscuous stereotype and reject prejudices surrounding it.  
 
However, lets not just read the word promiscuous and react violently against it. The word has negative connotations yet does not need to. Yes irresponsible sex that is uninformed and leads to dangerous situations should not be promoted. However, it is true that young people, both straight and gay do go through more than one sexual partner for many reasons. 
 
Here is the crux of the article, there is something of a pressure on gay men and women to be seen as opposing the promiscuous label given to us. However, this is not a gay label, it is a label attached to a sexual behaviour that transcends sexuality.  
 
Perhaps take the time to read the article again and see that I promote the idea of marriage as important for gay youths working towards relationships that are committed and monogamous. 
 
Finally, as for the review on the grammar of the piece, I have re-edited to clarify the message of the article and do hope it makes for a better read. 
 
Should you wish to discuss further the content or issues of the piece however, do not hesitate to email me at rad@thegyc.com  
 
Best 
 
Rob 

Guest